Search engines have emerged recently that allow individuals to check specific types of content—books and images—for use as AI training data.

We link to the search tools, and include tips on preventing your data from being used to train AI models.

At the Transparency Coalition we believe AI policy discussion and legislative action happen at many levels simultaneously. Our mission is to address known AI safety and privacy risks with practical solutions. We’re focused on bringing transparency to both AI inputs and AI outputs.

Transparency in AI training data is the foundation of ethical AI.

State legislatures should consider measures that require developers of AI systems and services to publicly disclose specified information related to the datasets used to train their products.

The hailstorm of AI-related lawsuits over the past year can make the litigation space feel chaotic and confusing. In fact, the lawsuits can be roughly sorted into two buckets: copyright infringement and harmful AI-driven outcomes.

This TCAI curated guide offers a clear and concise overview of today’s AI legal battlefield.

The United States has no national data privacy law.

In the absence of a national regulatory mechanism, many individual states have adopted their own digital privacy laws to protect their citizens from the misuse of personal data.

We’ve gathered information on individual state laws, as well as national and local bills, in this TCAI guide.

In today’s AI ecosystem there are two general types of training data: organic and synthetic.

Organic data describes information generated by actual humans, whether that’s a piece of writing, a numerical dataset, a song, an image, or a video. Synthetic data is created by generative AI models using organic data as a base material.

Just as a photocopy of a photocopy can drift away from the original, when generative AI is trained on its own synthetic data, its output can also drift away from reality, growing further apart from the organic data that it was intended to imitate.

The use of synthetic data isn’t inherently good or bad. In medical research, for example, it’s a critically important tool that allows scientists to make new discoveries while protecting the privacy of individual patients.

At the Transparency Coalition, we are not calling for limitations on the creation or use of synthetic data. What’s needed is disclosure: Developers should be transparent in their use of synthetic data when using it to train an AI model.

Training data is the foundation of artificial intelligence. It’s what AI systems like ChatGPT use to provide answers to the prompts we provide. It’s what generative image systems like Midjourney and DALL-E use to conjure AI-created art.

With the emergence of generative AI, it now takes just a few button-clicks for anyone to create or manipulate data and convince others that fake content is real. 

Training data is the foundation of artificial intelligence. It’s what AI systems like ChatGPT use to provide answers to the prompts we provide. It’s what generative image systems like Midjourney and DALL-E use to conjure AI-created art.

Today most media/tech companies are coalescing around the standard created by the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) .

Developers of AI systems should be required to provide documentation for all training data used in the development of an AI model.

Legislative policies requiring the disclosure of the use of AI are developing side-by-side along the emerging standards in AI provenance. They’re not perfectly in sync—and that’s okay.

With the emergence of artificial intelligence systems like ChatGPT and CoPilot, data privacy has emerged as one of the most urgent consumer protection issues of the 2020s.

Most state data privacy laws in the U.S. operate on an opt-out basis, meaning that users are assumed to have consented to the use of cookies unless they actively decline, ie, opt out. 

At the Transparency Coalition we believe the most important AI output provision is also the most basic: Disclose the use of AI.

California’s AI Transparency Act, adopted in Sept. 2024, provides a model for this kind of disclosure. The Act requires AI developers to embed detection tools in the media their AI creates, and to post an AI decoder tool on their website.

AI computer systems are trained to think, learn, and make decisions independently. While common algorithms follow step-by-step instructions to solve specific tasks, AI systems can analyze data, recognize patterns, and improve their performance over time without explicit programming for every scenario.

At its heart, an AI system is a highly sophisticated computer program. That program, known as a model, requires enormous amounts of computing power and massive datasets. By ingesting the datasets, the model “learns” about the structure of language, for instance, or patterns derived from millions of images.